Wednesday, November 29, 2023

The Family Album

 


The Family Album

In May of 2007, I discovered the following Thought of the Day and shared it with my husband Larry Van Horn. I discovered it this afternoon; he had written in it in one of his genealogical journals.  This amazing description of a family album is as relevant today as it was in 2007. I know Larry would want me to share it with all our blog readers, and genealogy groups. .
I hope you enjoy it.
Gayle Van Horn


The Family Album
Pull out that old family album and scan the faces. These people on these pages brought you to this point.
Their lives are the cornerstones of your life. Their sacrifices are your mandate to continue building … invest in yourself … and in all that comes next.

Just as they formed your foundation – your work lays a foundation for lives after you.
Your family album is a picture of the tenacity and strength in your DNA. It is a study of perseverance. Secrets of survival that carry through your veins.

To settle for less than you are capable of is to squander not just your life – but their lives – and your legacy to future generations. One generation’s position is the next generation's reposition. Picture that!
(Thought of the Day by T.D. Jakes)
27 May 2007) 

Thursday, June 1, 2023

Who are the real parents of Clarissa Boswell?

 Over 30 years ago there was a great debate among Boswell researchers about who the parents of Clarissa Boswell 2 November 1811 – 9 June 1884) KHQQ-7XC was. 

Additional research and DNA testing have proven conclusively that the parents of Clarissa was 
James Boswell LQZP-LZS and Lena Seane Mullin K2FD-4MH.

Research Notes/Emails

Email from Larry Van Horn (3/24/2002)

As most of you are aware I have been searching long and hard for some time now for the parents of Clarisa Boswell-Hurt-Zumwalt. After many, many false starts and strange twisted paths, I might have finally found a very promising lead and a possible breakthrough in this search.

This breakthrough is courtesy of my wife Gayle, my father WL, and Jay Mercer's parents. Let me backtrack a bit. Several years ago my father met with Jay's family and they passed on to him copies from the family bible, several letters written by Burford to his brother AHD (Hamy), some pics, Mary Susan Redus's diary, and a very interesting letter written by AHD's cousin Maud. This letter is enclosed below.

 Several years ago Gayle transcribed this letter and I have been looking ever since for this possible connection. I conducted many census searches over the last two years looking for a Maud Hurt but I could not find one. One quiet evening here in my office while studying the letter a light bulb went off and it dawned on me that this might not be a Hurt, but could be a family member for Clarisa -- a Boswell. Since the letter was written in Oct 1870 in Columbus, Lowndes Co, MS (birthplace of AHD Hurt) I immediately checked the census index for Lowndes Co, MS 1870 for Boswell and bingo. I got a hit.

Here is that enumeration:

1870 Lowndes Mississippi U.S. Federal Census, Page 227, 506/749

Boswell, Ira        46    M    W    Carpenter   $1500  GA
          Jane     36    F     W    Keeps House           AL
          C.        18    M    W    App?Shop               MS
          Maud   16    F    W    At School                 MS
       Thortant  9    M    W    At Home                   MS
          John      7    M    W                                    MS
            Emilie      4    F      F                                MS
              Ira         4    F     F                                MS

506/750 Goodrich, Sarah  54  F    W                                VA

If you examine Maud's letter to AHD she mentions her brother Johnny being sick. Notice that we have both a Maud (16-year-old school girl) and a John (7-year-old brother) in the above family. This is the only Boswell family I have found in Lowndes Co in 1870 so I am convinced this family and the one mentioned in the letter below are the ones I have been seeking.

 What makes this family more interesting is the names. My great-grandfather was named James Ira Hurt. I have always wondered where the Ira came from, now I think I know. More on the James name in a moment. One additional note on Maud who wrote the letter below, my wife Gayle has always felt that the lady who wrote the letter below was a young girl, and the census info above bears that theory out quite nicely.

 Having seen the above I felt that Ira was probably a brother to Clarisa Boswell. So it was time for me to go back in time to see where Ira above and Jane were married. With the elder Sarah Goodrich living in the house with them I theorized that she was probably an older sister but more than likely Jane's mother making her a Goodrich. With that bit of information, it did not take long to find a marriage record for Ira M. Boswell marrying Jane Goodrich on 11 July 1850 in Lowndes Co, MS.

 Now if they were married there in July 1850 and the census enumeration date for 1850 was 1 June, I was hoping to get lucky and maybe find the young couple either living at home with their separate families or maybe even married and enumerated together for the first time. Again it was back to the census index at Ancestry.com and again I struck gold. I did indeed find them not in Lowndes Co but in Winston County just SW of Lowndes. And they were living with an older couple named "Boswell."

 From the 1850 Lowndes Co Mississippi Federal Census, page 324, 124/127    Enumerated 3 Sep 1850

James Boswell    68    M    W    Farmer    $580    NC
Lena                   60    F     W                               GA
 

Note: this is an exact match to the birthplace locations Clarisa gave for her parents on the 1880 census in Medina Co.

 Continuing to something strange, the next four people in the household were crossed out but I do not have a clear indication of why. The way they were listed they all had the last name Boswell.

Henry              21    M    W                                MS
James              19    M    W                                MS
Elizabeth          16    F     W                                MS
Josephine         12    F     W                               MS
 
And finally in the same household (124) but family #128

 
Ira Boswell      31    M    W   Mechanic              GA
Jane                 17    F      W                               MI
 

Even though her birth location was different from this enumeration from 1860 there is no doubt who this couple is. It is the parents of Maud. Of course, my immediate thought was if Ira M. Boswell above is Clarisa's brother and James Boswell above is his parents then this is Clarisa's parents. The age of the head of household #127 and his wife above are certainly within range to be Clarisa's parents.

 Interestingly enough on the census page previous (I teach my students to look up and down a census page, the one prior and the one after) I found another Boswell.

 116/119
James Boswell   51    M    W    Farmer    $1500    NC
Louisa               36    F      W                                GA
William              21    M    W                                 AL
Robert               18    M    W   Student                  MS
Mary                 16    F                                          MS
Emily                 14    F                                          MS
Charles               7    M                                          MS
Richard              5     M                                          MS
Laura                 4     F                                           MS
James              7/12   M                                          MS
 

If this family is related, I am reasonably confident they are this could be a brother to Clarisa (probably James and Lena Boswell's oldest son). Keep in mind that in 1850 William P. Hurt (age 43 and Clarissa (age 37) were enumerated in Madison County, MS with their family including my gg grandfather Hamy.

 Going back to the census index I again found Ira and Jane on the 1860 census in Columbus, Lowndes Co. Here is that enumeration:

1178/1198
Ira Boswell        40    M    Carpenter                    GA
Janes                 27    F                                        AL  (notice the state)
Charles             8      M                                        MS
Florence           7       F                                        MS (this is Maud)
Henry                2     M                                        MS
Sarah Goodrich   59  F                                        VA (the age has me a bit baffled)
 
And finally I found Ira and his family on the 1880 Lowndes Co Census.

Florence Maud Boswell was still living at home but was now married to Francis M. Jacob and had children of her own as indicated below:

 
Census Place: Columbus, Lowndes, Mississippi
Source: FHL Film 1254655  National Archives Film T9-0655     Page 224C
 
Relation Sex Marr Race Age Birthplace Ira M. BOSWELL Self M M W 60 GA
 Occ: Carpenter Fa: GA Mo: GA
Jane BOSWELL Wife F M W 48 AL
 Occ: Keeping House Fa: VA Mo: VA
Thornton H. BOSWELL Son M S W 21 MS
 Occ: Carpenter Fa: GA Mo: AL
John G. BOSWELL Son M S W 19 MS
 Occ: Apprentice To Machinest Fa: GA Mo: AL Annie E. BOSWELL Dau F S W 17 MS
 Occ: At Home Fa: GA Mo: AL
Ira M. BOSWELL Son M S W 14 MS
 Occ: At School Fa: GA Mo: AL
Kate T. BOSWELL Dau F S W 11 MS
 Occ: At School Fa: GA Mo: AL
Francis M. JACOB SonL M M W 31 GA
 Occ: Machinest Fa: GER Mo: GA
Florence M. JACOB Dau F M W 26 MS
 Occ: At Home Fa: GA Mo: AL
Charles H. JACOB GSon M S W 3 MS
   Fa: GA Mo: MS
Maud JACOB GDau F S W 2 MS
   Fa: GA Mo: MS
Marian Lee JACOB GSon M S W 10M MS
   Fa: GA Mo: MS
 
Shortly after I discovered this information I checked the Boswell surname board and saw a post of Ira Boswell's family from Marci Shaw Peralez. She has since contacted me via email and here is the info she has passed on. I have now added her email address to our small little group so I can keep her in the loop for anything new we may find.

As most of you know Clarisa was born circa 1811 in Georgia.

Below notice in particular child #2 Maud. This is probably our Clarisa. I would like to take a second and thank Marci for sharing her family info with us and I look forward to working with her in the near future since she does live in the area and can help with research.

 So there you have it cousins. I do believe we have finally found the parents of our 3rd great-grandmother Clarisa Boswell-Hurt-Zumwalt.

 I believe she was born to James Madison Boswell and Lena Mullins circa 1811-1812 in Georgia and her full name was probably Clarissa Maud Boswell.

I would also like to thank Marci Shaw Peralez for her help.  

===================================================

Addressed to Cousin Hamilton [Alexander Hamilton D Hurt] from Cousin Maud in Columbus, MS.
 
Columbus, Miss
Oct 22, 1870
 
My Dear Cousin,
 

I received your welcomed letter last week and it is with pleasure that I take up my pen to answer it.  If you think I have treated you badly I think you have treated me equally as bad.  It is nearly always twice as long before I ever get an answer to any letters from you.  I don't think it is hardly fair for you to complain of short-letters, for you rarely ever write much and though little at that.  The idea of you thinking you have said anything to hurt my feelings indeed you have and so I hope you...think so any longer.  You told - and to tell all of the relatives to write - I have told them.  I don't know why they don't write - perhaps they don't have to receive letters as well as I do.  Columbus is quite a sickly place, some are buried nearly everyday.  We have had a great deal of sickness in our family.

My little brother Johnnie has had two spells of the Typhoid fever.  He is getting well and is walking about, though he is still very feeble.  Pa has just recovered from a spell of chills.  He is working on the railroad, and we only see him once a week.  That sweetheart I gave you has been having the chills and looks very bad.  My sweetheart sent me his picture the other day.

He lives in Winston Salem, has...don't tell anybody about it.  Just ought to see what a sweet piece of poetry he wrote me about it.  I hope you don't think I am in love by what I write.  Far from that, I do not know what the word means.  But I expect you know all about it.  I think you ought to write me all about your sweetheart and tell me all about her, for I know you have one.  You say I promise to write you a long letter, I think I always do write you long ones.  If you will tell what will interest you - I will always write long ones for I do not know what will interest you period.  You must answer this letter as soon as you receive it, and I want you to write a long letter.  I don't care if it is five or six pages long.  Give my love to your brother.  Ma also sends her love to you and her.  I must bid a good night and goodbye until I hear from you again and do not let that be very long.  Remember me as Ever Your True Cousin,

 Maud

===================================================

From Cousin Marci:

 A lot of the info I have is from another Boswell researcher who has since passed away, and I have yet to find time to get up to MS to verify his info.

This is what I have on the James Boswell family:

 James Madison Boswell    b abt 1782  Granville, North Carolina    d 1850
Columbus, Lowndes Co, MS married 15 Oct 1809, Franklin Co, GA
spouse:
Lena Mullins    b 1790 GA    d abt 1850  Columbus, Lowndes Co, MS
 
Children:
1. Mary b abt 1810  Franklin Co, GA    married 19 Oct 1823  James Sampson:Monroe Co, MS
2. Maude b abt 1812   d Columbus, Lowndes Co, MS
3. Martha b abt 1814  d abt 1850    married 24 Jul 1838 to Samuel T. Sappington
4. Ransom Newton b 5 Jun 1814 GA  d 17 Jan 1892 Russellville, Pope Co, AR married 13 Apr 1845, Winston Co, MS to Elizabeth C. Higgason 5. Ira Matthews (Sr) b 1820 GA  d 14 Jan 1898 married 11 Jul 1850, Lowndes Co, MS to Jane Goodrich 6. Olive  b abt 1822 Monroe Co, MS married 9 Sep 1845 Lowndes CO, MS to Samuel Kline 7. Henry N.  b 22 Aug 1830 Monroe Co, MS  d 2 Aug 1884
8. Thomas J.   b 22 Jan 1826 Monroe Co, MS  d 12 Aug 1897 Lowndes Co, MS
9. James Madison (Jr)  b 16 Nov 1828 Monroe Co, MS  d 18 Apr 1897 Lowndes Co, MS married to Cornelia F. Smyth 10. Mary Elizabeth b abt 1833 Columbus, Lowndes Co, MS  d abt 1900 11. Josephine b 1838 Columbus, Lowndes Co, MS  d abt 1923, Lowndes Co, MS married 10 Feb 1857 to William M. Woodward
 

I have children for Ransom, Ira, Olive, Henry, Thomas, James, and Josephine if you are interested in those.

 
The parents of James Madison Boswell Sr. were:
Ransom Boswell b bet 1727/1729   d 1793
Martha d 1812 (second wife of Ransom)
 
children of Ransom and Martha:
1. James
2. Susanna b 1784 Granville Co, NC married 19 Mar 1803 Granville CO, NC to John M. Stovall 3. Joseph b 1786 Granville Co, NC  d 1855 Pontotoc (now Union Co) MS married
17 Jan 1809 Granville Co, NC to Lucy Ann Griffin 4. Elizabeth b 1788 Granville Co, NC 5. William b 1792 Granville Co, NC  d 14 May 1857, Cass, Bartow, GA married
23 Dec 1816 to Louisa Whitworth
 
Ransom Boswell was first married to Mary Holliday.  They had 5 children:
1. John b abt 1753 Spotsylvania Co, VA d abt 1822 Franklin Co, GA married
1780 Mecklenburg, VA to Sarah Wilkinson (John and Sarah were the parents of Ransom Perkins Boswell, and his 5 siblings)
2. Ann b 1756 Spotsylvania Co, VA d Orange Co, NC married 1774 to Bartholomew Stovall 3. Thomas b 1752 Spotsylvania Co, VA  d 1800  Caswell Co, NC married 1785 N.
Mecklenburg VA to Judith Wilkinson (sister of Sarah) 4. Frances b 1762 Spotsylvania Co, VA 5. Ransom (Jr.) b 29 Jun 1766 Spotsylvania Co, VA  d 8 Nov 1835  Locust Hill, Caswell Co, NC married 15 Nov 1790 Granville Co, NC to Elizabeth Moss
 
Ransom Sr. was the son of John Boswell and Ann Ransom
Marci Shaw Peralez

=====================================================

Wednesday, February 8, 2023

Biographical and Historical Memoirs of Louisiana Pages 429-430

This is one of the original sources I had back in the 1980s on my Van Horn family in Louisiana. These books back in the day were known as vanity history books and the writeups were written and submitted for publication by the families themselves. In essence, it was their version of their family history. This fine source but as I have discovered has one major flaw and some inaccuracies. I will have more to say about that in a later post.

Source URL: 





Sunday, February 5, 2023

European Origin of Christiaen Barents Van Hoorn, Immigrant

 


For many years, the Van Horn family legend for those who descended from Christiaen Barents Van Hoorn was our family "originated in Hoorn, Holland." That is exactly what it was - a legend - a myth! Here is where we really are from. 

From The American Genealogist, V47, pages 173-175

So Are Frisians German or Dutch?

The Frisians are a Germanic ethnic group native to the coastal regions of the Netherlands and northwestern Germany. They inhabit an area known as Frisia and are concentrated in the Dutch provinces of Friesland and Groningen and, in Germany, East Frisia and North Frisia (which was a part of Denmark until 1864).






BEWARE of old or inherited Van Horn/Van Horne pedigrees

Researching early Van Horn families in Colonial America is a nightmare. There I said it and VH researchers really need to be aware that the early family genealogies were junk. But don't take my word for this. FTDNA Van Horn Y-DNA administrator Marleen Van Horne wrote about this on the Ancestry Van Horn Message Board in 2005:

"Pedigrees published on the Van Horn/Van Horne surname prior the 1958 are highly inaccurate. If you are a descendant of Cornelius Van Horne born 1695 in Brooklyn, or his brother, Abraham born 1698, Brooklyn, you will find two different sets of parents listed for these men, in pedigrees published on the web. "Sometimes, a date of 1706 is given for Cornelius birth. The brothers mentioned above are NOT the sons of Abraham Van Horne and Maria Provoost. Abraham and Maria had a son, Cornelius, in 1706, and two sons named, Abraham, in 1713 and 1719 ( years maybe off). All three of these children died young. "The correct parents for Cornelius and Abraham are Matthys Cornelissen and Fytie Adam Brouwer. Matthys was a Dane from Jutland and Fytie of German and Flemish origins. "The two best sources on the descendants of Matthys Cornelissen are Our Van Horne Kindred by Elsie O. Hallenbeck, 1958 and an article, The 1722 Conveyance, in the April, 1976, issue of De Halve Maen, by Paul E. Van Horn. Kindred is not perfect, but it is far better than any Van Horn/Van Horne genealogy prior to this date, and goes a long way to correcting the record."

In a private email to me in Dec 2005 Marleen provided some background on here the really bad stuff resides.

"I am particularly interested in putting to an end the bad Van Horn/Van Horne/Van Hoorn genealogy that is floating around the universe.  Between 1888, when Abram Van Horne published Our Kindred and 1958, when his granddaughter, Elsie O. Hallenbeck published Our Van Horne Kindered, many, many, many incorrect Van Horne pedigrees were published.  Van Horne descendants ( I will use this spelling, but read whatever applies.) have fallen in love with false ancestors and are really unwilling to let go, no matter how definitive the evidence.

"I just cannot see their point.  I would rather have the right ancestor, no matter what warts they may have.

"If I were you, I would research this line as if you had no idea where it was going.  In 1929, Marvin F. Van Horn published The Van Horn Family History.  It was a compilation of all the preceding Van Horne genealogies, plus the pedigrees and family group sheet compiled in an effort to get a piece of the estate of one Abraham Van Horn who died intestate.  Abraham was a descendant of Jan Cornelissen, so almost every pedigree in that book goes back to old JC.  Matthys Cornelissen who happens to be my Van Horne ancestor is not even mentioned, and his sons are attached to another family.

"Every Van Horne genealogy up to 1958 was based on the faulty pedigrees published up to that date.  Elsie's book is not without flaws, but it goes a long way to correct all of the errors made up to that time.  For example, Elsie spends some time going over Matthys Dutch origins. 

"WRONG, Matthys was from Jutland in Denmark, according to his marriage record.  How did Elsie make that mistake?  I can only speculate, but she must not have seen the original church records.  She must have used the Holland Society transcriptions from the 1890s, which left out the place of origin.

"Enough of this, you are duly warned."

So that is where we are at this point. I will be publishing some material that I can trust here on the blog as I can put it together. It is time to start straightening the Van Horn family genealogy once and for all.

Cousin Larry Van Horn





Thursday, January 19, 2023

TCCC Peachtree Spring 2023 Genealogy Classes

  

TCCC Peachtree Spring 2023 Genealogy Classes

Here is a list of the Spring Community Enrichment genealogy classes scheduled to be taught at Tri-County Community College in Peachtree, NC for 2023.

To reserve your seat in class or sign-up call Lisa Long at 828-835-4241. Sorry, no remote learning for these classes is available, in-class learning only.

Genealogy – Searching for Your Ancestors: Who am I and where did I come from? It is that intriguing question that has made genealogy research one of America's most popular hobbies. This popular class offers beginner and experienced genealogists alike a fresh approach to genealogy research. Subjects cover the full gambit from organizing your research to exploring your family history using traditional and electronic research, social media, and our newest tool, DNA testing. Whether you are new to genealogy or have been family hunting since microfilm days, this course will assist you in researching your family in the 21st century. This course is a prerequisite for advanced genealogy courses offered at TCCC. 30 hrs.

Instructor: Van Horn Classroom: Enloe Room 133

January 31 – April 18 Tuesday

6:30 p.m. – 9:00 p.m. $80

Genealogy – Researching Your Genealogy on the Internet: An old favorite is back on the schedule! The Internet offers the genealogist a wonderful array of databases, records, and other resources for researching your family history. This course will teach you how to find genealogy databases and discover your family history on the Web. All the top sites such as Ancestry, FamilySearch, GenealogyBank, Chronicling America, Find A Grave, and more will be covered. While our beginner/intermediate genealogy class is not a prerequisite to taking this course, a basic understanding of genealogy research principles is a must. A laptop or tablet capable of wireless internet access is required for this class. Sign up early since this is one of the more popular genealogy classes at TCCC and seating is limited. 10 hrs.

Instructor: Van Horn Classroom: Enloe Room 133

February 2 – February 23 Thursday

6:30 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. $35

NEW - DNA Beginner/Intermediate: If you are researching your family history, taking an autosomal DNA test has become a must-do task. There is a myriad of companies and sites that you can either test at or upload your DNA results to that will help you find new cousins and add new ancestors to that family tree. This class will explore the basics (including all three DNA tests), where to test, and working your results after you have tested. 7.5 hrs.

Instructor: Van Horn Classroom: Enloe Room 133

March 2 – March 16 Thursday

6:30 p.m. – 9:00 p.m. $25

NEW - Genealogy – Busting Through Genealogy Brick Walls: Having trouble finding the elusive ancestor? Can't seem to get that lineage any further back? Then this class is tailor-made for you. In this genealogy brick wall class, you will learn techniques, tricks, tips, and the latest proven methods to bust through the brick walls in your genealogy. During the class, you will have the opportunity to work one-on-one with the instructor on your family genealogy brick wall. 12.5 hrs.

Instructor: Van Horn Classroom: Enloe Room 133

March 23 – April 20 Thursday

6:30 p.m. – 9:00 p.m. $40

 

Friday, December 30, 2022

The Saga of Researching Ann Simpson.

Update: I may have found the parents of Ann Simpson. Father Arthur Simpson, Mother Mary Ester Tilton. Looks like this family is a Monmouth Co NJ family.




Sometimes I am amazed at how much bum information gets tied into our ancestor's stories. One such case was my 7th great-grandmother Ann Simpson. 

After years of searching for a record to prove where researchers found the maiden name of Simpson, using a tool many genealogists are not aware of "The Wayback Machine" which archives old websites, I was able to access my deceased cousin Richard S Hutchinson's website, long removed from the Internet is this statement:
"In the Will of Dorothy Newberry, widow of Richard Newberry, carpenter, of the City of Philadelphia, PA, dated 7 April 1731/2, proved 1 June 1731, Book E-Page 163, comes the following abstracted material - "sisters - Catherine Stout, Anne Hutchinson; brothers - William and Peter Simpson; cousins - John and Haskar Newberry; friends - Jenkin Jones, Jane Pearce; nurse - Alice Haig; brother-in-law: William Hutchinson; executrix-Anne Hutchinson; trustee- Jenkin Jones; witnesses- John Kearsley, Jno. Cadwalder." [PA Wills - 1682-1834].

Her place of birth has been listed as Rhode Island. I can find no record of that. In the source noted above, the same person who stated she was a Simpson stated she was from Long Island, not Rhode Island. That is a much better fit with all the New Jersey connections. After additional research, I found where the Vohn middle name came from and it does not belong to this Ann Simpson. From Charles Frederick Gross, Cincinnati The Queen City 1788-1912, Vol. 4 (Cincinnati: S.J.Clark Publishing Company, 1912), 148, [HathiTrust] via website: https://www-personal.umich.edu/~bobwolfe/gen/mn/m3137x3138.htm "There are reports [likely wrong] that Ann was born in Amsterdam, Holland. "William Hutchinson was born in 1695, and his wife, whose maiden name was Ann Von, was born March 6, 1700. She was a native of Amsterdam, Holland, and at the age of six years was kidnapped and brought to America. There is speculation that she is of royal lineage. They were married in 1723. Ann Von was born on March 6, 1700, in Amsterdam, Holland. When a child of six years, she was kidnapped and brought to America."

This claim has been proven wrong and she was not a Vohn nor did she have a middle name Vohn.

Ann Simpson. She lived 101 years, 9 months, and seven days. You can see her tombstone at Find A Grave https://www.findagrave.com/.../30304729/ann-vohn-hutchinson




Wednesday, December 28, 2022

Robert James Faulk; Tift County, GA

Went looking for a Rootsweb page I documented in my Legacy program several years ago. It has since been taken off the net. But not to worry the  "Wayback Machine" website came to the rescue. So here is another family information/source rescued from the Internet. Here is that page for those Faulk researchers who need it.

Bios: Robert James Faulk;  Tift County, GA

Copyright 2004 by Dot Goodman Sims. This copy contributed for use in the USGenWeb Archives.  Jsimsfam@aol.com

************************************************************************
USGENWEB ARCHIVES NOTICE:  These electronic pages may NOT be reproduced in any format for profit or presentation by any other organization or persons. Persons or organizations desiring to use this material, must obtain the written consent of the contributor, or the legal representative of the submitter, and contact the listed USGenWeb archivist with proof of this consent. The submitter has given permission to the USGenWeb Archives to store the file permanently for free access. http://www.usgenwebarchives.org
************************************************************************
Robert James "Bob" Faulk (1838-1917)

Our Faulk line came into central Georgia from Johnston County, North Carolina about 1795 with James and Sarah Faulk, a young couple who first settled on land they purchased on Rocky Comfort Creek and Greissen Branch in Warren County, Georgia, southwest of Augusta.  They sold part of that land and moved on to Wilkinson County around 1799 where many of our Faulks lived in or near for the next 100 years. During that century, counties were created out of other counties, and it may be that the county names changed, and the Faulks remained.  For instance, we found them in surrounding Twiggs and Pulaski Counties, both cut out of former county Wilkinson.  

James was the son of Thomas Faulk, a Revolutionary Soldier, and Mary Hinnant of North Carolina. We find James and Sarah in Wilkinson County, Georgia in 1800s and they remained there until they died - James in 1852. James and Sarah had at least six children: Susan, John Needham "Buck", Bethany, Porter, Rebecca and Elizabeth "Betsy." Their son Porter Faulk is the father of our Robert James Faulk.  

In 1820, James and Sarah is found in the Wilkinson County Census, won land in the lottery and appeared on the Georgia Tax List.  He was again shown on the Georgia Tax List in 1824.  Then, he had two draws in the land lottery of 1832 (limited to Revolutionary Soldiers).  He also appears in Wilkinson County in the 1840 Census as a Farmer and then, in his eldest years, in the 1850 Census, living in the household of his son-in-law Aaron Carr (husband of daughter Elizabeth "Betsy" Faulk).

Porter Faulk (father of our Robert James Faulk) was born in Wilkinson County Georgia on December 5, 1800 and died before 1860.  He married Susan Winderweedle, daughter of Dr. Henry Winderweedle (believed to be Dutch) on September 29, 1824 by Peter Buckholtz, Justice of the Peace, in Wilkes County, Georgia.  Susan was born in 1805 and died in 1888 in Wilkinson County, Georgia.  Porter was a farmer and lived in and around Wilkinson County all his life.  Porter and Susan had at least eight children, one of them was our Robert James Faulk, born July 1838 in Wilkinson County, Georgia, the others were James, William, Lydia Ann, Thomas, Laura Ann, Billington and Franklin.

Robert James Faulk was known as "Bob." In 1860, at age 21, he was living in Twiggs County, Georgia with his first wife, Sarah Jane Martin, age 18, working as an overseer with a personal value of $805. The following year, the War Between the States broke out, and in May of 1862, this gallant young man was pulled away from his young wife and a baby girl to serve with the 54th Georgia Regiment, Company A. The next three years would drag him through some of the bloodiest battle fields of the Confederacy, and keep him hanging on until his Regiment had no more fight and was forced to surrender with the rest of the Confederate soldiers having lost so many to death, injury and sickness.  Bob didn't get through it totally unscathed, he was shot in the back where the bullet remained until he died in 1917. We have been told by family accounts that Bob did not have the bullet removed because, in order to receive medical attention, he would have to "swear allegiance" to the United States of America and many resolved southerners who had fought for the Confederate States of America refused to give in to what they had sacrificed their time, families and lives to fight against. We have been told that he would not swear which we can assume meant that he would not swear allegiance.
 
While we have not yet found very many family documents that can re-create the life of Bob Faulk, much can be gathered from the known history of the places where he lived during his life the causes in which he was involved and the recalled memories and mentions of those who did know him.  Through the study of Civil War history, one can find enough accounts and photographs that it is possible to almost relive those times. And, we know our Bob was there  with the 54th Regiment from 1862 until the close of the war. During the earlier months of Bob's enlistment, he was stationed around Savannah (Siege Train) in the Artillery Division then when the War heated up in 1863, he was deployed to the battlefields for the remainder of the time.  We know the battles in which his regiment and company were engaged and while there are many accounts of those particular conflicts. I have chosen some summaries to help guide us through those years with Bob.

CONFEDERATE GEORGIA TROOPS

54th Regiment, Georgia Infantry 
54th Infantry Regiment, organized at Savannah, Georgia, during the summer of 1862, contained men recruited in the counties of Lamar, Appling, Harris, Muscogee, Bartow, Bibb, Chatham, and Barrow. The unit moved to the Charleston area and was involved in numerous conflicts including the fight at Battery Wagner. Later it was assigned to Mercer's and J.A. Smith's Brigade, Army of Tennessee. The 54th participated in the Atlanta Campaign, Hood's Tennessee operations, and the Battle of Bentonville. During the Atlanta Campaign, July 20 to September 1, 1864 it reported 93 casualties and in December, 1864, totaled 168 effectives. The regiment surrendered on April 26, 1865. Colonel Charlton H. Way, Lieutenant Colonel Morgan Rawls, and Major William H. Mann were in command. 

GRIMBALL'S LANDING, SOUTH CAROLINA
Other Names: Secessionville, James Island 
Location: City of Charleston and James Island 
Campaign: Operations against Defenses of Charleston (1863) 
Date(s): July 16, 1863 
Principal Commanders: Brig. Gen. Alfred H. Terry [US]; Brig. Gen. Johnson Hagood [CS] 
Forces Engaged: 6,800 total (US 3,800; CS 3,000) 
Estimated Casualties: Total unknown (US unknown; CS 18) 
Description: To divert Confederate reinforcements from a renewed attack on Fort Wagner, Gen. Gillmore designed two feints. An amphibious force ascended Stono River to threaten the Charleston & Savannah Railroad bridge. A second force, consisting of Terry's division, landed on James Island on July 8. Terry demonstrated against the Confederate defenses. On July 16, the Confederates attacked Terry's camp at Grimball's Landing. Because of incomplete reconnaissance of the difficult, marshy ground, the disorganized Confederate attack was soon aborted. Their mission accomplished, Federal troops withdrew from the island on July 17. 
Result(s): Inconclusive 

CHARLESTON HARBOR, SOUTH CAROLINA
Other Names: Battery Gregg, Fort Wagner, Morris Island, Fort Sumter 
Location: Charleston County 
Campaign: Operations against Defenses of Charleston (1863) 
Date(s): September 7-8, 1863 
Principal Commanders: Maj. Gen. Quincy Gillmore [US]; Gen. P.G.T. Beauregard [CS] 
Forces Engaged: Regiments: total unknown (US 413; CS unknown) 
Estimated Casualties: (US 117; CS unknown) 
Description: During the night of September 6-7, Confederate forces evacuated Fort Wagner and Battery Gregg pressured by advancing Federal siegeworks. Federal troops then occupied all of Morris Island. On September 8, a storming party of about 400 marines and sailors attempted to surprise Fort Sumter. The attack was repulsed. 
Result(s): Confederate victory

KENNESAW MOUNTAIN, GEORGIA
Other Names: None 
Location: Cobb County 
Campaign: Atlanta Campaign (1864) 
Date(s): June 27, 1864 
Principal Commanders: Maj. Gen. William T. Sherman [US]; Gen. Joseph E. Johnston [CS] 
Forces Engaged: Military Division of the Mississippi [US]; Army of Tennessee [CS] 
Estimated Casualties: 4,000 total (US 3,000; CS 1,000) 
Description: On the night of June 18-19, Gen. Joseph E. Johnston, fearing envelopment, withdrew his army to a new, previously selected position astride Kennesaw Mountain. This entrenched arc-shaped line, to the north and west of Marietta, protected the Western & Atlantic Railroad, the supply link to Atlanta. Having defeated General John B. Hood troops at Kolb's Farm on the 22nd, Sherman was sure that Johnston had stretched his line too thin and, therefore, decided on a frontal attack with some diversions on the flanks. On the morning of June 27, Sherman sent his troops forward after an artillery bombardment. At first, they made some headway overrunning Confederate pickets south of the Burnt Hickory Road, but attacking an enemy that was dug in was futile. The fighting ended by noon, and Sherman suffered high casualties. 
Result(s): Confederate victory 

ATLANTA, GEORGIA
Other Names: None 
Location: Fulton County 
Campaign: Atlanta Campaign (1864) 
Date(s): July 22, 1864 
Principal Commanders: Maj. Gen. William T. Sherman [US]; Gen. John Bell Hood [CS] 
Forces Engaged: Military Division of the Mississippi [US]; Army of Tennessee [CS] 
Estimated Casualties: 12,140 total (US 3,641; CS 8,499) 
Description: Following the Battle of Peachtree Creek, Hood determined to attack Maj. Gen. James B. McPherson's Army of the Tennessee. He withdrew his main army at night from Atlanta's outer line to the inner line, enticing Sherman to follow. In the meantime, he sent William J. Hardee with his corps on a fifteen-mile march to hit the unprotected Union left and rear, east of the city. Wheeler's cavalry was to operate farther out on Sherman's supply line, and Gen. Frank Cheatham's corps were to attack the Union front. Hood, however, miscalculated the time necessary to make the march, and Hardee was unable to attack until afternoon. Although Hood had outmaneuvered Sherman for the time being, McPherson was concerned about his left flank and sent his reserves, Grenville Dodge's XVI Army Corps to that location. Two of Hood's divisions ran into this reserve force and were repulsed. The Rebel attack stalled on the Union rear but began to roll up the left flank. Around the same time, a Confederate soldier shot and killed McPherson when he rode out to observe the fighting. Determined attacks continued, but the Union forces held. About 4:00 pm, Cheatham's corps broke through the Union front at the Hurt House, but Sherman massed twenty artillery pieces on a knoll near his headquarters to shell these Confederates and halt their drive. Maj. Gen. John A. Logan's XV Army Corps then led a counterattack that restored the Union line. The Union troops held, and Hood suffered high casualties. 
Result(s): Union victory

JONESBOROUGH, GEORGIA
Other Names: None 
Location: Clayton County 
Campaign: Atlanta Campaign (1864) 
Date(s): August 31-September 1, 1864 
Principal Commanders: Maj. Gen. William T. Sherman [US]; Lt. Gen. William J. Hardee [CS] 
Forces Engaged: Six corps [US]; two corps [CS] 
Estimated Casualties: 3,149 total (US 1,149; CS 2,000) 
Description: Sherman had successfully cut Hood's supply lines in the past by sending out detachments, but the Confederates quickly repaired the damage. In late August, Sherman determined that if he could cut Hood's supply lines, the Macon & Western and the Atlanta & West Point Railroads, the Rebels would have to evacuate Atlanta. Sherman, therefore, decided to move six of his seven infantry corps against the supply lines. The army began pulling out of its positions on August 25 to hit the Macon & Western Railroad between Rough and Ready and Jonesborough. To counter the move, Hood sent Lt. Gen. William J. Hardee with two corps to halt and possibly rout the Union troops, not realizing Sherman's army was there in force. On August 31, Hardee attacked two Union corps west of Jonesborough but was easily repulsed. Fearing an attack on Atlanta, Hood withdrew one corps from Hardee's force that night. The next day, a Union corps broke through Hardee's troops which retreated to Lovejoy's Station, and on the night of September 1, Hood evacuated Atlanta. Sherman did cut Hood's supply line but failed to destroy Hardee's command. 
Result(s): Union victory 

FRANKLIN, TENNESSEE
Other Names: None 
Location: Williamson County 
Campaign: Franklin-Nashville Campaign (1864) 
Date(s): November 30, 1864 
Principal Commanders: Maj. Gen. John M. Schofield [US]; Gen. John B. Hood [CS] 
Forces Engaged: IV and XXIII Army Corps (Army of the Ohio and Cumberland) [US]; Army of Tennessee [CS] 
Estimated Casualties: 8,587 total (US 2,326; CS 6,261) 
Description: Having lost a good opportunity at Spring Hill to hurt significantly the Union Army, Gen. John B. Hood marched in rapid pursuit of Maj. Gen. John M. Schofield's retreating Union army. Schofield's advance reached Franklin about sunrise on November 30 and quickly formed a defensive line in works thrown up by the Yankees in the spring of 1863, on the southern edge of town. Schofield wished to remain in Franklin to repair the bridges and get his supply trains over them. Skirmishing at Thompson's Station and elsewhere delayed Hood's march, but, around 4:00 pm, he marshaled a frontal attack against the Union perimeter. Two Federal brigades holding a forward position gave way and retreated to the inner works, but their comrades ultimately held in a battle that caused frightening casualties. When the battle ceased, after dark, six Confederate generals were dead or had mortal wounds. Despite this terrible loss, Hood's army, late, depleted and worn, crawled on toward Nashville. 
Result(s): Union victory 

NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE
Other Names: None 
Location: Davidson County 
Campaign: Franklin-Nashville Campaign (1864) 
Date(s): December 15-16, 1864 
Principal Commanders: Maj. Gen. George H. Thomas [US]; Gen. John Bell Hood [CS] 
Forces Engaged: IV Army Corps, XXIII Army Corps, Detachment of Army of the Tennessee, provisional detachment, and cavalry corps [US]; Army of Tennessee [CS] 
Estimated Casualties: 88 total (US 23; CS 65) 
Description: In a last desperate attempt to force Maj. Gen. William T. Sherman's army out of Georgia, Gen. John Bell Hood led the Army of Tennessee north toward Nashville in November 1864. Although he suffered terrible losses at Franklin on November 30, he continued toward Nashville. By the next day, the various elements of Maj. Gen. George H. Thomas's army had reached Nashville. Hood reached the outskirts of Nashville on December 2, occupied positions on a line of hills parallel to those of the Union and began erecting fieldworks. Union Army Engineer, Brig. Gen. James St. Clair Morton, had overseen the construction of sophisticated fortifications at Nashville in 1862-63, strengthened by others, which would soon see use. From the 1st through the 14th, Thomas made preparations for the Battle of Nashville in which he intended to destroy Hood's army. On the night of December 14, Thomas informed Maj. Gen. Henry W. Halleck, acting as Maj. Gen. Ulysses S. Grant's chief of staff, that he would attack the next day. Thomas planned to strike both of Hood's flanks. Before daylight on the 15th, the first of the Union troops, led by Maj. Gen. James Steedman, set out to hit the Confederate right. The attack was made and the Union forces held down one Rebel corps there for the rest of the day. Attack on the Confederate left did not begin until after noon when a charge commenced on Montgomery Hill. With this classic charge's success, attacks on other parts of the Confederate left commenced, all eventually successful. By this time it was dark and fighting stopped for the day. Although battered and with a much smaller battle line, Gen. Hood was still confident. He established a main line of resistance along the base of a ridge about two miles south of the former location, throwing up new works and fortifying Shy's and Overton's hills on their flanks. The IV Army Corps marched out to within 250 yards, in some places, of the Confederate's new line and began constructing fieldworks. During the rest of the morning, other Union troops moved out toward the new Confederate line and took up positions opposite it. The Union attack began against Hood's strong right flank on Overton's Hill. The same brigade that had taken Montgomery Hill the day before received the nod for the charge up Overton's Hill. This charge, although gallantly conducted, failed, but other troops (Maj. Gen. A.J. Smith's, (Israelites) successfully assaulted Shy's Hill in their fronts. Seeing the success along the line, other Union troops charged up Overton's Hill and took it. Hood's army fled. Thomas had left one escape route open but the Union army set off in pursuit. For ten days, the pursuit continued until the beaten and battered Army of Tennessee recrossed the Tennessee River. Hood's army was stalled at Columbia, beaten at Franklin, and routed at Nashville. Hood retreated to Tupelo and resigned his command. 
Result(s): Union victory 

BENTONVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
Other Names: Bentonsville 
Location: Johnston County 
Campaign: Campaign of the Carolinas (February-April 1865) 
Date(s): March 19-21, 1865 
Principal Commanders: Maj. Gen. William T. Sherman and Maj. Gen. Henry Slocum [US]; Gen. Joseph E. Johnston [CS] 
Forces Engaged: Sherman's Right Wing (XX and XIV Corps) [US]; Johnston's Army [CS] 
Estimated Casualties: 4,738 total (US 1,646; CS 3,092) 
Description: While Slocum's advance was stalled at Averasborough by Hardee's troops, the right wing of Sherman's army under command of Maj. Gen. O.O. Howard marched toward Goldsborough. On March 19, Slocum encountered the entrenched Confederates of Gen. Joseph E. Johnston who had concentrated to meet his advance at Bentonville. Late afternoon, Johnston attacked, crushing the line of the XIV Corps. Only strong counterattacks and desperate fighting south of the Goldsborough Road blunted the Confederate offensive. Elements of the XX Corps were thrown into the action as they arrived on the field. Five Confederate attacks failed to dislodge the Federal defenders and darkness ended the first day's fighting. During the night, Johnston contracted his line into a 'V' to protect his flanks with Mill Creek to his rear. On March 20, Slocum was heavily reinforced, but fighting was sporadic. Sherman was inclined to let Johnston retreat. On the 21st, however, Johnston remained in position while he removed his wounded. Skirmishing heated up along the entire front. In the afternoon, Maj. Gen. Joseph Mower led his Union division along a narrow trace that carried it across Mill Creek into Johnston's rear. Confederate counterattacks stopped Mower's advance, saving the army's only line of communication and retreat. Mower withdrew, ending fighting for the day. During the night, Johnston retreated across the bridge at Bentonville. Union forces pursued at first light, driving back Wheeler's rearguard and saving the bridge. Federal pursuit was halted at Hannah's Creek after a severe skirmish. Sherman, after regrouping at Goldsborough, pursued Johnston toward Raleigh. On April 18, Johnston signed an armistice with Sherman at the Bennett House, and on April 26, formally surrendered his army. 
Result(s): Union victory


After the War was over, Bob Faulk, having witnessed and survived some of the most horrific events in our history, returned to the war-torn state of Georgia to pick up the pieces and raise a family.  He went back to farming, and became a Baptist preacher.  He and Sarah Jane Martin had four more children together  Nancy J. 'Fannie', born 1869, Elizabeth 'Sallie' Faulk, born 1873; Laura J. Faulk, born October 26, 1877 and Robert Faulk, Jr., born December, 1879 in Pulaski County, Georgia
It is believed that Sarah Jane died around 1880' and Bob was then married to Sarah Jane Arnold Howell.  Sarah Jane Arnold Howell already had three children from her previous husband Daniel Howell (who had died) -- Linda, Matilda and William 'Bud' Howell.  Bob and Sarah Jane had two children together: John Faulk, born May 1883 and Edna Jane Faulk, born November 2, 1889.
A document from 1895 was located in the Civil War Archives in which our Robert 'Bob' Faulk attested to a pension application for James M. Garland.  His responses to the witness questions give us a little insight into his directness and honesty.
STATE OF GEORGIA
PULASKI COUNTY

Robt. J. Faulk, of said State and County, having been presented as a witness in support of the application of James W. Garland for pension under the Act approved December 15th, 1894, and after being duly sworn true answers to make to the following questions, deposes and answers as follows:

1. What is your name and where to you reside?  Robt. J. Faulk.  Pulaski County, Ga.
2. Are you acquainted with James W. Garland, the applicant, if so how long have you known him?  I am, and have known him 30 years.
3. Where does he reside, and how long has he been a resident of this State?  Hancock County, Ga. And has lived in this State ever since I have known him.
4. Do you know of his having served in the Confederate Army or the Georgia militia?  How do you know this?  I know he served in the Confederate Army.  I was with him.
5. When, where and in what company and regiment did he enlist?  Milledgeville, Ga. 54th Regt. Co. A.
6. Were you a member of the same company and regiment?  I was.
7. How long did he perform regular military duty, and what do you know of his service as a Confederate soldier, and the time and circumstances of his discharge from the service?  From 1862 until the close of the was in 1865.  Was a good soldier and always done his duty.
8. What property, effects or income has the applicant?  (Give your means of knowledge)  Nothing.
9. What property, effects or income did the applicant possess in 1893 and 1894, and what disposition, if any, did he make of same?  Don't know but I don't think he had anything.
10. What is the applicant's occupation and physical condition?  He is unable to do anything.  He is very feeble  I can't say what his disease is.
11. Is the applicant unable to support himself by labor of any sort.  If so, why?  He is.  On account of his very feeble condition as above stated.  I do not know his disease.
12. How was he supported during the years 1893 and 1894?  I don't know.
13. What portion of his support for these two years was derived from his own labor or income?  I don't know.
14. Give a full and complete statement of the applicant's physical condition that entitles him to a pension under the Act of December 15th, 1894?  I know he was a good Soldier.  And the scars on his body and limbs show that he was.  I only know that he is feeble, his looks show that.  He is unable to work.
15. What interest have you in the recovery of a pension by this applicant?  None at all.

Around 1898, the family moved from Pulaski County to Irwin County, Georgia and lived near where Liberty Baptist Church is today where records show the Faulk family attended church and Bob Faulk donated money toward a new church building in 1906.  It is not known if Bob preached at Liberty Baptist or another area church, but we do know that he was a preacher.

On November 9, 1916, Robert Faulk applied for his military pension.

Robert Faulk's grandson, Robert Goodman (named after his grandfather), recalls stories told to him by his grandmother Faulk:
During the Civil War, a bandit broke into camp one night and stole the food money.  Robert, along with several other soldiers, jumped on horseback and rode through the night chasing the thief.  They were so happy when they apprehended the thief, they rejoiced by pulling up an apple tree.

Robert was shot in the back during the Civil War... and never had the bullet removed... on the account he would have to swear to have it taken out... and he did not swear.  

An Account by Dot Goodman Sims:

Daddy proudly showed John and me a shotgun that appeared to be unique. The hunting gun, from the Civil War Era, had belonged to his Grandfather (Robert Faulk) and protruded a very long barrel (already sawed off 6 inches by Daddy's father) and a "ring" near the breach lock trigger. Daddy told us that when Grandma Faulk heard the gun go off in the "head" (swamp head), she'd go ahead and get the grease hot -- Grandpa Faulk didn't miss.  
Robert Faulk was a good man and lived a good life. He taught his children well and set the example for them. We only have to look around us to see some of the effect of Robert's life for much of who he was has been passed down to many of us through the generations.
Written and compiled by Dot Goodman Sims

Tuesday, December 20, 2022

Albemarle County, Virginia deeds involving various Micajah Clarks

 From the Linda Sparks Starr Genealogy Archives - ALBMRDDS

These Albemarle County, Virginia deeds, all involving various Micajah Clarks, were transcribed DEC 1994 by Linda Sparks Starr.

I've left underlines (___) where letters/words were unreadable and placed a question mark "?" to show others areas of uncerainty. This first one is to Micajah Clark Jr. (1741 - 1774). "McDaniel" to Clark is the margin l note, but deed shows McDonald.

Albemarle Co. Virginia Deed Book 5, page 370-1:

This Indenture made on the Tenth day of September in the year of our Lord One thousand Seven hundred and Seventy One between Archibald McDonnald On the One part and Micajah Clark Jun'r of the Other part. Witnesseth that the said Archib'd McDonnald for and in Consideration Of the Sum of thirty Eight pounds, to him in hand paid, do give grant Bargain and Sell to the said Micajah Clark Jun'r and his Heirs One parcell of Land in the County of Albemarle Containing by Estimation four hundred Acres, and Bounded as followeth Beginning at Several pointers a Corner to James Defor Runing thence On the said Defor South forty-five degrees East Seventy four poles to a pine, thence new lines the Same Course Continued One hundred and thirty Seven poles to a pine, South forty five degrees West, three hundred and four poles Crossing a run of Mechunk Creek to a red Oak and pine, North forty five degrees West two hundred and Eleven poles to pointers in Robert Adam's line in the low ground of the West Side of a run of Cavills Creek, and thence On the said Adams North forty five degrees East, three hundred and four poles to the first Station, together With all its Appurtenances To Have and to Hold the Said parcel of Land With its appurtenances to the said Micajah and his Heirs to the Sole use and behoof of the Said Micajah and his Heirs and the Said Archib'd McDonnald for himself and his Heirs do Covenant With the said Micajah and his Heirs, that he the said Archib'd McDonnald, and his Heirs the said parcel of Land With he appurtenances, to the said Micajah and his Heirs, against

371 all persons whatsever Will for ever warrant and defend In Witness whereof the said Archib'd McDonnald have hereto Subscribed his name and affixed his Seal the day and year above writ-
ten.

Signed Sealed and delivered
In presence of
James Marks                    his
Henry Mullins              Archib'd  A. McDonnald
Richard Napier                her mark
Dabney Minor            Mary Ann v  McDonnald
                       mark


1771 Then Rec'd of Mr. Micajah Clark Junr the Sum of thirty Eight pounds being the full Consideration for the Within Lands Test.

At Albemarle March Court 1772
This Indenture was prov'd by the Oaths of James Marks, Henry Mullins & Richard Napier Witnesses thereto and Ordered to be recorded.
                    Test
                  Tucker Woodson DC

------------
[This second deed is between Micajah Sr. (1718-1808) and his wife Judith Adams and their son Bolling (1751-1818). Witnesses John, James and William Clark are sons; Jonathan Landers is "likely" the second husband of daughter Penelope. Who/what relationship is Micajah Defor to them, other than neighbor? LSS]


Albemarle Co. Virginia Deed Book 7, pages 356-7:
This Indenture made this Eight day of September In the year of our Lord one thousand Seven hundred and Seventy Nine Between Micajah Clark and Judith his Wife of Albemarle of the one part and Boling Clark of the Said County of the Other part Witnesseth that the Said Micajah Clark & Judith his Wife for in Consideration of the Sum of one thousand pounds Virginia currency to him in hand paid at or before the sealing and Delivory (sic) of these presents the Right whereof We doth hereby Acknowledge have
granted Bargained and Sold and By these presents Both grant Bargain and Sell alien Release and Confirm unto the Said Boling Clark all 

357 Their Right and title In and to a Sertain (sic) Track or parcel of Land left to me the Said Judith Clark by Robert Adams her father dec'd four hundred Acres of Land Lying and being in the County of Albemarle and Bounded By the Lands of James Marks, Wm Daniel Fitch James Defor Micajah Clark Jn'r Dec'd and the land of  the Micajah Clark Sen'r Together with their and every of their appertenances to the Same belonging or in any wise appertaining and the Revisor and Revisors Remainder and Remainders thereof and all the Estate Right title __ntres property claim and Demand of them the Said Micajah Clark and Judith his Wife to the Said premises to have and to hold the Said Land and premises with their and Every of theirs appurtenances unto the Said Boling Clark his Heirs and Assigns to the only proper use and Behoof of him the Said Boling Clark his Heirs and assigns forever and the Said Micajah Clark and Judith his Wife for themselves their Heirs Executors and Administrators Doth Covenant agree to and with the Said Boling Clark His Heirs and Assigns the Said Lands and premises against him the Said Micajah Clark and Judith his Wife their Heirs Executors and Administrators and against any other person what ever Claiming By or under them Shall and will Warrant and for ever Defend by these presents In witness Whereof the Said Micajah Clark and Judith his Wife hath hereunto Set their hands and affixed their Seals the Day and year above Written. Signed Sealed and Delivered   Interlined in the third and ninth In the presents (sic) of    lines Before Send Original Deed

Test
John Clark x 
James Clark x               his
Jonathan Landers x       Micajah  M  Clark
William Clark               mark
    his               her
Micajah + Defor        Judith  J  Clark
    mark               mark

[x's above--signed by mark or some sort of check off? LSS]

At Albemarle September Court MDCCLXXLX
This Indenture was prov'd by Jno Clark James Clark & Jonathan Landers Witness thereto & ordered to be Recorded
                      Test
                   Hudson Matrin D Clk

-----------------------
[This third deed is between Micajah Clark Jr. b. 1758, son of Christopher Clark (1737 - 1803) and Millicent Terrell. Micajah's wife is Penelope Gatewood; they moved to Christian Co. KY. Christopher is the son of Micajah Sr. and Judith Adams.]


Albemarle County, Virginia Deed Book 9, pages 21-2:

This Indenture made this Fourteenth day of October One Thousand Seven hundred and Eighty four Between Micajah Clark Jun. and Penelope Clark his wife of the Parish of Fredericksville in the county of Albemarle of the one part and William Crenshaw Jun. of the said Parish and of the said County of the other Part Witnesseth that the said Micajah Clark Jun'r and Penelope Clark his wife for and in the consideration of the sum of one hundred pounds current money of Virginia to them in hand paid hath
granted bargained and Sold and by these presents doth grant bargain Sell and deliver unto the said William Crenshaw Jun'r to his heirs and assigns one certain Tract or parcel of Land situate lying and being in the Parish of Fredericksville in the county of  Albemarle containing Two hundred and fifty acres be the same more  or less and bounded as followeth to wit, Begining at a white oak thence north forty five degrees east seventy four poles to pointers thence south thence south (sic) forty five degrees east & Two hundred and Eleven poles to a red Oak south fifteen degrees West one hundred and Eighty Eight poles to pointers South seventy five degrees west seventy five poles to pointers thence crossing
C__els Creek North fifteen Degrees west two hundred and Eighty six poles to pointers same course continued thirty-five poles to the first station it being all the Lands the Said Micajah Clark Jun'r Claimeth within the courses above mentioned and the reversion and Reversions, Remainder and Reminders and all and singular the premises with the appurtenances thereto belonging or in any wise appurtaining. To have and to hold the said Tract of Land and premises unto the said William Crenshaw Jun'r his heirs and assigns to the only proper use and behoof of him the said William Crenshaw Jun'r his heirs and assigns forever and the said Micajah Clark Jun'r & Penelope Clark his wife doth further Cove-

22 -nant and agree to and with the said William Crenshaw Jun that the above sold Land and premises they will not only from those claiming in Reversion under them but from all and every other person or persons whatsoever warrant and defend and that at all times hereafter they will make and execute or cause to be made and executed any other conveyance or assurance by Deed or other wise that may be adjudged by those skilled in the Law necessary for the greater surty or sure making the premises  aforesaid the same being always at the proper cost and charges of him her or them requiring the same In Witnesseth whereof the said Micajah Clark Jun'r and Penelope Clark his wife have hereunto set their
hands and seals the day and year above written 
Signed sealed and delivered        Micajah Clark
in Presence of              Penelope Clark

Memo that on the day and year within written Quiet possession and ?Session of the Land and premises within mentioned was had and taken by the said Micajah Clark Jun and Penelope Clark his wife and by them delivered unto the said William Crenshaw Jun his heirs and assigns according to the true intent and meaning of the within written Deed.
Sealed and delivered in presence of

Received the day and year within written the sum of hundred pounds current money being the full consideration for the within sold Land and premises

At Albemarle October Court MDCCLXXXIV 
This Indenture memorandum and receipt were acknowledged by Micajah Clark party thereto and ordered to be recorded. Penelope his wife _____ly appeared in Court and after being privately ex-
amined as the Law directs voluntarily relinquished her right of Dower in the Land conveyed by the said Indenture
         Teste     H. Martin D Clk

------------------
[The clerk in this deed spelled CLARK as "Clarck" throughout. This one is from Micajah Sr. (1718-1808) and Judith to son William. This "may be" the last time Judith's name appears in official records.]

Albemarle County, VA Deed Book 10, pages 523-4:

This Indenture made this first day of Aprile anno Domini one thousand seven hundred and ninety three Between Micajah Clarck and Judith his wife of the County of Albemarle of the one part and William Clark his son of the same County of the other part. Witnesseth that the said Micajah Clarck and Judith his Wife for and in consideration of the sum of three hundred Pounds current money of Virginia to them in hand paid by the said William Clarck the receipt whereof they do hereby

524 acknowledge have given granted and confirmed and by these presents do give grant and confirm unto the said William Clarck all that tract or parcel of land whereon he now lives containing four hundred and fifty Eight acres more or less lying and being in the County of Albemarle on the east side of the little Mountains and bounded by the lands of Edward ?Love/More  Benjamin Defor the said William Clarck John Harvin William D. Fitch and James Robertson to have and to hold the said tract or parcel of Land with its appurtenances to the said William Clarck his heirs and assigns forever, and they the said Micajah Clarck and Judith his wife for themselves and their heirs do covenant and agree to and with the said William Clarck that they will warrant and for ever defend the title of the said tract or parcell of Land against the claim or claims of all and every person or persons whatsover.

   In Witness whereof the said Micajah Clarck and Judith his wife have hereunto set their hands and affixed their seals the day and year above written

Sign'd Seal'd & delivered
In the presence of                  his
Jacob Oglesby               Micajah  M  Clarck
William Clarck                    mark
    his                   her
William X Robertson          Judith  X  Clarck
    mark                   mark

At Albemarle April Court 1790 
This Indenture was produced into Court Acknowledged by Micajah Clarck one of the parties thereto and ordered to be recorded.
                    John Nicholas C AC

---------------------
[This deed is between Micajah Sr. and Judith and their grandson, Thomas Martin Clark, son of dec'd son Micajah Jr. (1741 - 1774).] 


Albemarle Co. Deed Book 8, page 149:

This indenture made this Twenty third day of July one Thousand seven hundred and Eighty four Between Micajah Clark and Judith Clark his wife of Albemarle County of the one part and Thomas Mar
tin Clark of the said county of the other part. Witnesseth that the said Micajah Clark and Judith Clark his wife for and in consideration of avalluable sum to us in hand paid hath granted, bargained & Sold & by these presents do grant bargain, sell and deliver unto the said Thoams Clark and to his Heirs & assigns one certain Tract or Parcell of Land Situate Lying and being in the parish of Fredricksville in the County of Albemarle on the north side of the Rivanna River Containing by Estimation one hundred acres be the same more or less Beginning at James Defor corner Pointers running thence along the said Defoes & W. Daniels lines S43 W204 po to Moremans Corner W.0. by the road thence along Moreman's line N 29 1/2 W106 po to pointers thence a new line N54 E74 po to a pine in Defoor line and with Defoor's line 49 E  67 po to the begining and the Revirsion & Revirsions, Remainder and Remainders & all the premesses with the appurtenances thereunto belonging or in any wise appurtaining To Have And to Hold The said Tract of land and premises unto the said Thomas Martin Clark, his heirs and assigns forever the said Micajah Clark and his wife doth covenant & agree to and with the said Thoams Clark that the above sold Land and premises they will not only from those claiming in Revirsion under them but from all and every other person & persons whatsoever warrent and defend to him the said Thoams Clark his heirs or assigns the same being always at the proper cost and charges of him, her or them Requiring the same In Witness where of the said Micajah Clark & Judith his wife hath hereunto set their hands and seals the day and year above
written.                    his
Signed, sealed & Delivered        Micajah (X) Clark
In presence of                 mark
  James Clark                 her
  Bowling Clark            Judith (J) Clark
  William Clark                mark

At Albemarle August Court MDCCLXXXIV This Indenture was Acknowledged by Micajah Clark party thereto and ordered to be recorded.            Teste
                      H. Martin DCLK
         

-----------------
[The following two deeds were transcribed JUL 1996. This first is between the above Thomas Martin Clark and "probably" his brother William (aft 1767-1806). The following one is questionable--could
be his brother or his "uncle" William (1760-1800) based on the first being William Clark Jr. and the second William Clark.]


Albemarle Co. VA Deed Book 9, page 486:

THIS INDENTURE made this Ninth day October in the year of our Lord one thousand Seven hundred & Eighty Eight Between Thomas Martin Clark & Milley his wife of Albemarle County of the one part & William Clark Junior of the said County of the other part.  Witnesseth that the Said Thomas Martin Clark for & in Consideration of the Sum of one hundred pounds Current Money of Virginia to him 
in hand paid the Receipt whereof he doth hereby acknowledge hath given granted bargained & Sold & by these presents doth give grant bargain & sell unto the said William Clark Jr his Heirs and assigns for Ever all that Tract or parcel of land lying & being in the County of Albemarle Containing fifty acres 

[487] be the same more or less & beining (sic) the same that the said Thomas Clark had of his grand Father Micaj Clark Senr and bounded by John Harvie, Micajah Clark & William Clark Senr. Beginning at a pine stake in Jacob Oglesys Cornfield thence South forty two degrees W Eighty poles to a white oak uppon the N side of the Road thence N.W. one hundred & four poles to a Cornerpine Cut Down thence N fifty two E to a New Corner pine made in dividing the said land above Mentioned & this being one ?moety thereof & from thence to the Beginning To have and to hold the same tract or parcel of Land with Its appurtenances to the William Clark Junr. his Heirs & assigns for Ever & the Said Thomas Martin Clark and Milley his wife for themselves & their Heirs do and Each of them doth covenant and agree to & with the said William Clark jr. that they will warrant and defend the title of the Said tract or parcel of Land to William Clark jr his heir & assigns for Ever against the Claim or Claims of Every person or persons What soever. In Witness whereof the said Thomas Martin Clark & Milley his Wife hath hereinto Set their hands & affixed their Seals the day & year above written. 
Signed Sealed & delivered
In the presence of        Thomas Clark  seal
  Edward Moore           Milley Clark  seal
  Tho Moore
  Robert Clark

At Albemarle October Court 1788
This Indenture was acknowledged by Thomas Martin Clark one of the parties thereto and ordered to be Recorded.  Test
                      John Nicholas CC

-------------------
Albemarle Co. VA Deed Book 9, page 487:

THIS INDENTURE made this Ninth day of October in the year of our Lord one thousand Seven hundred & Eighty Eight Between Thomas Martin Clark & Milley his Wife of Albemarle County of the one part & William Clark of the said County of the other part.  Witnesseth that the said Thomas M. Clark for & in Consideration of the Sum of one hundred & twenty three pounds Current Money of Virginia to him in hand paid the Receipt whereof he Doth hereby acknowledge hath given granted

[488] bargained & Sold & by these presents doth give, grant bargain & Sell unto the Said William Clark his heirs & assigns for Ever all the tracts or parcels of Land lying & being in the County of Albemarle Containing four Hundred & fifty acres be the Same more or less & being the Same that the Said Thomas Martin Clark Claims under his late Father Micaj Clark Junr deceased & Known by the Name of McDanels tract, & also inCluding fifty acres one half of one hundred which the Said Thomas M. Clark had of his Grand father Micaj Clark Senr & Bounded as followeth (to Viz) Beginning at a pine Corner in James Defoes line thence along said Defoes line S forty two Degrees W to the sd Defoes Corner thence
along the said Defoes line S forty five Degrees E Seventy four poles to a pine the same line Continued one hundred & thirty Seven poles to a pine S forty five W three hundred & four poles Crossing a branch of Machunk Creek to a Red oak & pine N forty five Degrees W two hundred & Eleven poles to a Red oak in Robert Adams's line in the low ground of the West Side of a Run of ?Carrol Creek thence on the Said Adams line N forty five Degrees E to a pine stake on the said line a new Corner Corner (sic) made 
thence N thirty Six W to a new Corner pine made in dividing the Said one hundred acres thence N fifty two degrees E Ninety three poles to a pine & from thence to the Beginning To have and to hold the said Tracts or parcels of land with Its appurtenances to the Said William Clark his heirs & assigns for Ever & the said Thomas M. Clark and Milley for themselves & their heirs do & Each Doth Covenant & agree to & with the Said William Clark that they will warrant & Defend the title of the Said tracts or parcels of
Land to the Said William Clark his Heirs & aŸsigns for Ever against the Claim or Claims of Every person or persons what soever. In Witness whereof the said Thomas Martin Clark & Milley his wife hath hereunto set their hands & affixed their seals the day & year above Written.
Signed Sealed & delivered
In the presence of        
  Edward Moore             Thomas Clark  seal
  Thos Moore              Milley Clark  seal
  Robt Clark

At Albemarle October Court 1788
This Indenture was acknowledged by Thomas Martin Clark one of the parties thereto & ordered to be Recorded.
                 Test  John Nicholas CC

------------------
[This obit, sent to LSS from Kay Baganoff, was copied from microfilm by her uncle. The only citation supplied is a copy of the masthead: VA ARGUS, Friday July 29, 1808, published at Richmond by Samuel Pleasants. This is a typical microfilm copy including large streaks in all the wrong places. I did my best, using question marks when uncertain.]

DEPARTED this life on the 21st inst at his residence in the county of Albemarle MICAJAH CLARK, sen. aged 91 years, after a lingering ilness of 7 (? could be 2) months which he endured to the last, with  unceasing  patience,  and  a  christian ?Ukefore_ories, altho he was from the commencement of this ill
ness, confidently impressed with the belief he should never recover. This venerable man, hath had the happiness of enjoying a long and well spent life, in good health, almost uninterrupted, never having experienced more than one attack previous to the one which carried him off.  He was, in every respect, perfectly uniform and temperate; his benign and humane contenance, plainly indicated the purity and benevolence of his heart, and opened an avenue to ?its/his innermost recesses by which any one might
enter. How melancholy are the ?sensations we feel, when meditating on the loss of this, our friend, and the friend of mankind -- Philanthropy, humanity, morality and benevolence will severely deplore his loss, and shed a tear in remembrance of his departed shade. It's needless to recount the many amiable qualities which  were united in this man; they are well known to all who knew him;  but to those who knew him not, suffice it to say, he was a kind and benevolent neighbor, a humane and tender master, and that the poor never passed unheeded by him. The writer of these lines, hath from his infancy, known this man, whose loss we deplore, and in making the foregoing communication he has done it conscien-
tiously. 

July 26, 1808.  A FRIEND.